This fantastic editorial featuring the stunning Karen Elson shot by Steven Meisel was posted over at fashiongonerogue this morning. I have to confess I've not seen it before, but just fell in love with the whole shoot so thought I'd post it here to share.
I really love narrative editorials, and this just looks like it was so much fun to shoot. Karen looks so so beautiful here, I just adore the way her hair has been styled, very old Hollywood.
Not too sure how frequently I'll be posting over the next few weeks as my university workload is mad until the middle of June, with performances and an exam, but I'll try my best to update as often as I can.
love xxx
(Image credit: fashiongonerogue.)
Friday, April 30, 2010
Monday, April 26, 2010
26.04.2010- Louboutin Love
I came across these images over at fashionista yesterday; it seems that they may be the early stages of Christian Louboutin's first ever print advertising campaign. Shot by Khuong Nguyen, each image depicts a slice of red soled heaven in scenes which evoke a classic fairytale/mythological ambience.
I really like the fantastical quality of these shots; they affirm the iconic status of the Louboutin heel not just as a sought after shoe, but also as a work of imagination, art and craftsmanship.
What do you think of the images? Does Louboutin need to advertise?
(Image credit: fashionista.)
I really like the fantastical quality of these shots; they affirm the iconic status of the Louboutin heel not just as a sought after shoe, but also as a work of imagination, art and craftsmanship.
What do you think of the images? Does Louboutin need to advertise?
(Image credit: fashionista.)
Monday, April 19, 2010
19.04.2010
Vogue Germany May 2010, Victoria Beckham shot by Alexi Lubomirski.
I think she looks beautiful here, and I can't wait to see the rest of the editorial.
(Image credit: fashiongonerogue.)
I think she looks beautiful here, and I can't wait to see the rest of the editorial.
(Image credit: fashiongonerogue.)
Sunday, April 18, 2010
18.04.2010- Grace Kelly: Style Icon
The latest exhibition at the wonderful Victoria and Albert Museum in South Kensington showcases the timeless elegance of one of the most iconic women of the 20th century: Grace Kelly. As well as featuring costumes worn by Grace in films such as Rear Window and High Society, the exhibition also includes items from her personal wardrobe, including the dress she wore upon first meeting Prince Rainier of Monaco (whom she later went on to marry) and couture pieces designed by Dior, Balenciaga and Givenchy. Much like Audrey Hepburn, Grace Kelly has become synonymous with the sophistication, glamour and beauty of a bygone era and is regularly referred to as a style icon.
So what makes her style and approach to fashion so enduring and appealing to us today? Firstly, she was unquestionably naturally beautiful, with an exquisite bone structure, radiant complexion and luminous eyes. Secondly, her uncomplicated approach to fashion led to the development of a style that favoured simple elegance and classic shapes, leading retailers in the 1950's to develop the 'Grace Kelly look', so fans and the fashion conscious could emulate her style. Finally, the fairytale path her life followed saw her evolve from screen princess to real-life princess and forever made her a cultural icon. In her new role, she became patron of many Parisian fashion houses, and through the 60's and 70's her style continually evolved.
To me, Grace Kelly represents classic elegance at its finest; her intelligent approach to fashion demonstrates that style does not originate from slavish adherence to trends, but rather from a clear recognition that timeless fashion originates from a personal understanding of what works for you; after all, Grace wore the clothes, the clothes didn't wear her.
The exhibition opened at the V&A yesterday and runs until September 26th, I can't wait to visit for myself.
For more information visit V&A Online.
(Image credit: V&A Prints.)
So what makes her style and approach to fashion so enduring and appealing to us today? Firstly, she was unquestionably naturally beautiful, with an exquisite bone structure, radiant complexion and luminous eyes. Secondly, her uncomplicated approach to fashion led to the development of a style that favoured simple elegance and classic shapes, leading retailers in the 1950's to develop the 'Grace Kelly look', so fans and the fashion conscious could emulate her style. Finally, the fairytale path her life followed saw her evolve from screen princess to real-life princess and forever made her a cultural icon. In her new role, she became patron of many Parisian fashion houses, and through the 60's and 70's her style continually evolved.
To me, Grace Kelly represents classic elegance at its finest; her intelligent approach to fashion demonstrates that style does not originate from slavish adherence to trends, but rather from a clear recognition that timeless fashion originates from a personal understanding of what works for you; after all, Grace wore the clothes, the clothes didn't wear her.
The exhibition opened at the V&A yesterday and runs until September 26th, I can't wait to visit for myself.
For more information visit V&A Online.
(Image credit: V&A Prints.)
Saturday, April 17, 2010
17.04.2010- Cover Stars
Vogue Paris, May 2010, starring: Meryl Streep, Gwyneth Paltrow, Penelope Cruz, Naomi Watts, Kate Winslet and Julianne Moore, in a feature shot by Inez and Vinoodh. Coming soon to a newsstand near you!
Thoughts?
(Image credit: fashiongonerogue)
Thoughts?
(Image credit: fashiongonerogue)
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
14.04.2010- Love Never Dies
Love Never Dies, The Adelphi Theatre, 07.04.2010, 2.30pm.
Andrew Lloyd Webber’s much anticipated continuation of The Phantom of the Opera opened in London last month to a mixed critical reception. Many of the reviews I have read since the first night of Love Never Dies have been sceptical about whether Lloyd Webber’s latest musical can live up to the towering reputation of the original, which, at nearly twenty five years old stands alone as the singularly most successful piece of entertainment of all time. It is fair to say that Love Never Dies, as an extension of the Phantom mythology will inevitably be compared to its theatrical ancestor, but, in my opinion, and based upon what I saw last week, the pieces must be considered as separate entities in order to be fully appreciated.
Love Never Dies is set ten years subsequent to the events of The Phantom of the Opera, and the characters relocated to New York’s Coney Island, a dizzying world of circus sideshow and vaudeville hubbub. Innovative sets, designed by Bob Crowley and beautifully offset by Jon Driscoll’s breathtaking projections create an aesthetic which simultaneously encapsulates the graceful Art-Nouveau tastes of the period and the developing popular fascination with the bizarre. The vast space of the Adelphi, fully equipped for this production with a drum revolve is exploited to its full potential in order to create a realm which the Phantom himself appropriately describes as ‘illusions domain/Where music and beauty and artifice reign’. Personally, I found the ingenuity of the creative choices made in this production to be completely compelling, and, perhaps most pertinently of all, unlike anything I had ever seen attempted on stage before.
The stumbling block with the production for many critics in the reviews I have glanced over seems to have arisen from what they perceive to be an implausible storyline. Summarising the plot as briefly as possible, Christine Daaé, prodigy soprano taught by The Phantom in Paris, is invited (unknowingly) by him to sing at his Coney Island resort, Phantasma. She is now married to Raoul, her childhood sweetheart, has a son, ten year old Gustave, and accepts the offer to perform in order to pay off her husband’s gambling debts, acquired in a haze of alcohol-fuelled foolishness. As Christine is reunited with her teacher, revelations a plenty ensue, bets are hedged and the piece hurtles towards a tragic conclusion. What the critics seem to have forgotten in their consideration of the ‘weak’ book is the fact that, musical theatre, by its very nature is often fantastical and implausible. It is not, after all, realist drama which offers profound insights upon the human psychology or the world in which we live, but rather is a genre which is defined by the convention of the audience having to suspend its disbelief, otherwise it would cease to exist as soon as the first performer spontaneously began to sing. Ultimately, musical theatre has mass appeal because it is the ultimate in theatrical escapism; put in simple terms, the rules of real life don’t apply to the world of musicals, otherwise how could one explain productions based upon magical kingdoms called Oz and troupes of all-singing, all-dancing cats?
Plot and aesthetics aside, Love Never Dies also represents for Lloyd Webber a return to top form as a composer. Of course the songs he has newly created will undoubtedly be judged in comparison to pieces from the original such as Music of the Night and Masquerade, which have since become iconic within the musical theatre oeuvre. Of the Love Never Dies score, ‘Til I Hear You Sing and the title track are the most evocative of the original timbre, but new melodies such as The Beauty Underneath and Dear Old Friend are equally unforgettable. Perhaps the greatest demonstration of Lloyd Webber’s skill as a composer is demonstrated not in individual songs however, but when the score is considered as a whole. The juxtaposition of vaudeville ditties (such as Bathing Beauty and Heaven By The Sea), powerful duets (Devil Take the Hindmost, Once Upon Another Time) and soaring instrumentals (The Ayrie, The Coney Island Waltz) sets the Love Never Dies score apart in that it encapsulates so many sub-genres and operates extremely successfully outside of the operatic framework which defined its predecessor.
In summary, I found Love Never Dies an engaging and innovative piece, both on a technical and performance level. Standout performances from Tam Mutu (understudying a sadly indisposed Ramin Karimloo) as The Phantom, Sierra Boggess as Christine, Joseph Millson as Raoul and Summer Strallen as Meg in the lead roles are formative in driving the plot forward and each excelled in all of the musical numbers. Niamh Perry, Adam Pearce and Jami Reid-Quarrell are also commendable in the roles of Fleck, Squelch and Gangle respectively, the only major additions to the cast, who evoke the mystery and intrigue of Phantasma in triplicate. My advice is to ignore the critics; if you get the opportunity, go and see Love Never Dies leaving all of your preconceptions behind and draw your own conclusions about the piece. Theatre as a medium is, after all, defined by its ability to engage with the individual, and it is ultimately audiences, and not critics who determine the power of any performance.
Love Never Dies continues at The Adelphi Theatre, for more information visit www.loveneverdies.com.
(Image credit: telegraph.co.uk.)
Andrew Lloyd Webber’s much anticipated continuation of The Phantom of the Opera opened in London last month to a mixed critical reception. Many of the reviews I have read since the first night of Love Never Dies have been sceptical about whether Lloyd Webber’s latest musical can live up to the towering reputation of the original, which, at nearly twenty five years old stands alone as the singularly most successful piece of entertainment of all time. It is fair to say that Love Never Dies, as an extension of the Phantom mythology will inevitably be compared to its theatrical ancestor, but, in my opinion, and based upon what I saw last week, the pieces must be considered as separate entities in order to be fully appreciated.
Love Never Dies is set ten years subsequent to the events of The Phantom of the Opera, and the characters relocated to New York’s Coney Island, a dizzying world of circus sideshow and vaudeville hubbub. Innovative sets, designed by Bob Crowley and beautifully offset by Jon Driscoll’s breathtaking projections create an aesthetic which simultaneously encapsulates the graceful Art-Nouveau tastes of the period and the developing popular fascination with the bizarre. The vast space of the Adelphi, fully equipped for this production with a drum revolve is exploited to its full potential in order to create a realm which the Phantom himself appropriately describes as ‘illusions domain/Where music and beauty and artifice reign’. Personally, I found the ingenuity of the creative choices made in this production to be completely compelling, and, perhaps most pertinently of all, unlike anything I had ever seen attempted on stage before.
The stumbling block with the production for many critics in the reviews I have glanced over seems to have arisen from what they perceive to be an implausible storyline. Summarising the plot as briefly as possible, Christine Daaé, prodigy soprano taught by The Phantom in Paris, is invited (unknowingly) by him to sing at his Coney Island resort, Phantasma. She is now married to Raoul, her childhood sweetheart, has a son, ten year old Gustave, and accepts the offer to perform in order to pay off her husband’s gambling debts, acquired in a haze of alcohol-fuelled foolishness. As Christine is reunited with her teacher, revelations a plenty ensue, bets are hedged and the piece hurtles towards a tragic conclusion. What the critics seem to have forgotten in their consideration of the ‘weak’ book is the fact that, musical theatre, by its very nature is often fantastical and implausible. It is not, after all, realist drama which offers profound insights upon the human psychology or the world in which we live, but rather is a genre which is defined by the convention of the audience having to suspend its disbelief, otherwise it would cease to exist as soon as the first performer spontaneously began to sing. Ultimately, musical theatre has mass appeal because it is the ultimate in theatrical escapism; put in simple terms, the rules of real life don’t apply to the world of musicals, otherwise how could one explain productions based upon magical kingdoms called Oz and troupes of all-singing, all-dancing cats?
Plot and aesthetics aside, Love Never Dies also represents for Lloyd Webber a return to top form as a composer. Of course the songs he has newly created will undoubtedly be judged in comparison to pieces from the original such as Music of the Night and Masquerade, which have since become iconic within the musical theatre oeuvre. Of the Love Never Dies score, ‘Til I Hear You Sing and the title track are the most evocative of the original timbre, but new melodies such as The Beauty Underneath and Dear Old Friend are equally unforgettable. Perhaps the greatest demonstration of Lloyd Webber’s skill as a composer is demonstrated not in individual songs however, but when the score is considered as a whole. The juxtaposition of vaudeville ditties (such as Bathing Beauty and Heaven By The Sea), powerful duets (Devil Take the Hindmost, Once Upon Another Time) and soaring instrumentals (The Ayrie, The Coney Island Waltz) sets the Love Never Dies score apart in that it encapsulates so many sub-genres and operates extremely successfully outside of the operatic framework which defined its predecessor.
In summary, I found Love Never Dies an engaging and innovative piece, both on a technical and performance level. Standout performances from Tam Mutu (understudying a sadly indisposed Ramin Karimloo) as The Phantom, Sierra Boggess as Christine, Joseph Millson as Raoul and Summer Strallen as Meg in the lead roles are formative in driving the plot forward and each excelled in all of the musical numbers. Niamh Perry, Adam Pearce and Jami Reid-Quarrell are also commendable in the roles of Fleck, Squelch and Gangle respectively, the only major additions to the cast, who evoke the mystery and intrigue of Phantasma in triplicate. My advice is to ignore the critics; if you get the opportunity, go and see Love Never Dies leaving all of your preconceptions behind and draw your own conclusions about the piece. Theatre as a medium is, after all, defined by its ability to engage with the individual, and it is ultimately audiences, and not critics who determine the power of any performance.
Love Never Dies continues at The Adelphi Theatre, for more information visit www.loveneverdies.com.
(Image credit: telegraph.co.uk.)
Friday, April 2, 2010
02.04.2010- The Girl from Atlantis.
Sorry for the back to back image posts, but I came across this editorial from the May issue of Vogue Nippon yesterday and just had to share:
Alla Kostromicheva styled by George Cortina, photographed by Sølve Sundsbø. How beautiful do the Prada and McQueen pieces look here? The etheral quality of this editorial really brings the pieces to life in a whole new light.
(Image credit: fashiongonerogue.)
Alla Kostromicheva styled by George Cortina, photographed by Sølve Sundsbø. How beautiful do the Prada and McQueen pieces look here? The etheral quality of this editorial really brings the pieces to life in a whole new light.
(Image credit: fashiongonerogue.)
02.04.2010- Farewell to the Fairground...
'Le Cirque' from Marie Claire Italia, April 2010; Sophie Vlaming styled by Elizabetta Massari and photographed by Wendy Bevan.
The dark mood of this editorial comes across so well in the finished images, and the over-exposed feel of the images creates a real vintage postcard aesthetic. Also, how cute is the final shot?
(Image credit: fashiongonerogue.)
The dark mood of this editorial comes across so well in the finished images, and the over-exposed feel of the images creates a real vintage postcard aesthetic. Also, how cute is the final shot?
(Image credit: fashiongonerogue.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)